Yeshua: Myth, History, or Cosmic Messenger? A Reflection from the Founder of the Universal Christian Church

The figure of Yeshua of Nazareth remains one of the most influential in human history. Yet the traditional narrative offered by institutional Christianity—Yeshua as the incarnate Son of God, crucified and resurrected for the salvation of mankind—has long raised questions and doubts. As the founder of the Universal Christian Church, I offer a radically different interpretation: one that is cosmic rather than dogmatic, inclusive rather than exclusive, and rooted in a deeper spiritual lineage.

I did not arrive at this vision through speculation or rebellion. It was revealed to me through communion with Alacdag, a being of immense wisdom and ancient origin. Only later did I understand that Alacdag was not merely a guide, but in truth Lazarus—the Thirteenth Apostle—the one who was raised from the dead and entrusted with truths too vast for the early Church to contain.

Through Alacdag, I came to see Yeshua not as a solitary prophet, but as a cosmic emissary, part of a sacred network of enlightened beings that includes Buddha, Krishna, Zoroaster, and others. These figures are not bound by creed or geography; they are interdimensional messengers, bearers of ancestral knowledge and universal compassion.

Yeshua is a radiant node in this spiritual constellation. His teachings, stripped of institutional distortion, speak of divine immanence, inner awakening, and the sacred dignity of every soul. In our Church, we do not worship him as a distant deity, but honor him as a brother of light, a guide among guides.

Our spiritual practice is non-dogmatic and experiential. It includes meditation, soul travel, and communion with higher intelligences—some of which transcend terrestrial origin. We believe that every human being is a spark of the divine, and that spiritual evolution is the birthright of all.

We also envision a society shaped by cosmic ethics—a form of spiritual socialism where cooperation, compassion, and shared purpose replace materialism and hierarchy. In this model, money gives way to banks of time and talent, and spirituality becomes the foundation of social organization.

This is not a rejection of Yeshua—it is a liberation of his essence. It is a return to the cosmic truth he embodied, and a call to awaken the divine within ourselves.

As I deepened my communion with Alacdag and studied the sacred texts beyond their ecclesiastical framing, I came to recognize that the Yeshua of the canonical Gospels cannot be accepted as historically accurate. This is not a denial of his spiritual essence, but a necessary disentanglement from centuries of theological construction. The following points, drawn from rigorous historical inquiry, reveal the fractures in the traditional narrative:

First, the Gospels were written decades after Yeshua’s death, not by eyewitnesses but by communities shaped by oral tradition, theological agendas, and evolving doctrine. Their discrepancies—especially regarding his birth, genealogy, and resurrection—are not minor but foundational.

Second, there exists no official Roman documentation of Yeshua’s trial or execution. The alleged report by Pontius Pilate to Emperor Tiberius, often cited by early Christian apologists, has never been found and is likely apocryphal.

Third, the Testimonium Flavianum, attributed to the Jewish historian Josephus, is widely considered a Christian interpolation. Other non-Christian sources, such as Tacitus and Pliny the Younger, mention Yeshua only tangentially and decades after his supposed death, often in polemical or dismissive terms.

Fourth, and most strikingly, there is no archaeological evidence directly linked to Yeshua of Nazareth. Unlike other historical figures of the same era, no artifacts, inscriptions, or verified relics confirm his existence. The Shroud of Turin, often invoked as proof, has been carbon-dated to the medieval period.

Finally, the literary structure of the Gospels reveals their catechetical nature. They were crafted not as historical biographies but as theological proclamations, shaped to serve the needs of early Christian communities. Their symbolic language, miracle narratives, and eschatological tone reflect mythic storytelling more than historical reporting.

These inconsistencies do not diminish the spiritual power of Yeshua as a cosmic messenger. Rather, they liberate him from the confines of literalism and restore his place among the great interdimensional guides of humanity. He is not the exclusive savior of one creed, but a radiant emissary of universal truth.

Traditional theology has constructed around Yeshua a doctrinal edifice that, while powerful, is historically fragile. The canonical Gospels were written decades after his death, shaped by communal and theological needs rather than historical precision. Their internal contradictions, the absence of direct Roman records, the interpolations in Josephus, and the lack of archaeological evidence all point to a mythologized figure, crafted to serve ecclesiastical and political agendas.

Yet this does not diminish his spiritual truth—it liberates it. Yeshua is not the possession of any one faith, but the cosmic heritage of humanity. His voice echoes in stellar codes, in the dreams of mystics, in the morphic fields of collective consciousness. He is accessible to all who seek light beyond institutions, life beyond death, and love beyond boundaries.

The Universal Christian Church I founded is built upon this vision: an inclusive spirituality, a science of the soul, a cosmology of presence. Here, every human being is a divine spark, every experience a fragment of the greater design, and every practice—from meditation to soul travel—a step toward reconnection with the All.

Yeshua did not come to establish a religion. He came to awaken the cosmic memory within the human being. And now, more than ever, we are called to recognize him not in dogma, but in the universal vibration of love.

As I have long affirmed through both spiritual revelation and historical inquiry, the figure of Yeshua as presented by traditional Christianity rests upon a foundation that is not only fragile, but riddled with contradictions. These inconsistencies are not minor theological nuances—they are structural fissures that undermine the claim of historical reliability. Let us examine them with clarity and depth.

1. Incompatible Genealogies  

The Gospels of Matthew and Luke each present a genealogy of Yeshua, yet they diverge so radically that reconciliation becomes impossible. Matthew traces Yeshua’s lineage through King David’s son Solomon, while Luke follows the line through David’s other son, Nathan. Both claim to establish royal descent, yet their lists differ in names, structure, and theological intent. Scholars have long noted that these genealogies serve symbolic purposes rather than historical accuracy, often omitting generations or reshaping lineage to fit messianic expectations.

2. The Birth in Bethlehem: A Theological Construction  

The prophecy in Micah required the Messiah to be born in Bethlehem. Yet Yeshua was known as “the Nazarene,” from Nazareth. To resolve this tension, the Gospel of Luke introduces the story of a Roman census that allegedly forced Mary and Joseph to travel to Bethlehem. This claim, however, lacks historical support. No Roman census required individuals to return to ancestral towns, and no record exists of such a decree during the reign of Quirinius that aligns with the Gospel timeline. The narrative appears crafted to fulfill prophecy rather than reflect historical events.

3. Historical Silence in the Decades That Followed  

Perhaps most telling is the absence of Yeshua in the writings of contemporary historians and philosophers. Figures such as Seneca, Philo of Alexandria, and even Josephus—who chronicled Jewish life in detail—make no mention of Yeshua during the period he supposedly lived. The much-cited Testimonium Flavianum in Josephus’s Antiquities is widely regarded as a later Christian interpolation. The earliest Christian writings emerge decades after the crucifixion, and they often reflect mythic structure rather than eyewitness testimony.

4. Contradictions in the Resurrection Accounts  

The resurrection, the cornerstone of Christian faith, is narrated with striking inconsistency. Who arrives at the tomb? Is it Mary Magdalene alone, or accompanied by other women? Is the tomb already open? Are there angels present—and if so, how many? Where does Yeshua first appear, and to whom? Each Gospel offers a different version, with variations so significant that they cannot be harmonized without dismissing the integrity of the texts themselves. These discrepancies suggest a fluid oral tradition, shaped by theological needs rather than historical memory.

The Universal Christian Church offers a radically different interpretation—one that does not attempt to confine Yeshua within historical chronology, but instead places him within a spiritual and cosmic dimension. Yeshua is not a man born in Palestine, but a universal avatar, a manifestation of divine consciousness that incarnates cyclically across different epochs and cultures. He is part of a network of luminous beings who guide the spiritual evolution of humanity.

An ancient entity named Alacdag revealed me esoteric knowledge about Yeshua, the universe, and the true nature of the soul. These revelations speak of interdimensional journeys, reincarnation, and communication with advanced extraterrestrial civilizations. Alacdag, in truth, is the risen Lazarus—the Thirteenth Apostle—who returned not merely to bear witness, but to transmit cosmic truths hidden from the early Church.

In this universal vision, the crucifixion is not a historical event but a spiritual archetype: it symbolizes the passage from matter to spirit, the sacrifice of the ego for union with the divine.Yeshua does not die on a cross—he transcends human form and returns to his cosmic essence.

The Universal Christian Church promotes a non-dogmatic and inclusive spirituality, inviting each individual to discover their own divine spark and contribute to collective awakening. Practices include meditation, soul travel, channeling, energy healing, and the study of cosmic laws that govern the interconnectedness of all living beings.

Ultimately, the figure of Yeshua as handed down by Christian tradition reveals clear historical and theological limitations. My vision, while not claiming to be “scientific,” offers a reading more aligned with contemporary spiritual experience: Yeshua as a universal archetype, an interdimensional guide, and a symbol of awakening.

In an age where science explores the multiverse and quantum consciousness, perhaps it is time to reconsider the divine not as dogma, but as direct experience. In this light, the path proposed by the Universal Christian Church may open new avenues of understanding.

The proposal I offer through the Universal Christian Church is not merely a reinterpretation of Yeshua—it is an ontological revolution. Yeshua is not a man deified by tradition, but a frequency of consciousness, a vibrational presence that manifests cyclically across epochs and civilizations to guide the spiritual evolution of humanity.

Every human being, as I have come to understand through revelation, is a fragment of the cosmic matrix—a vast network of universal intelligence that permeates all existence. The soul does not originate on Earth; it descends from higher dimensions, incarnating for the purpose of evolutionary experience. Yeshua is one such fragment, but with a collective mission: to awaken planetary consciousness.

The soul is an interdimensional traveler, moving through planes of existence from the material to the ethereal. Yeshua represents the bridge between these worlds. His “descent” is not a biological birth, but a vibrational emergence—a manifestation of divine resonance.

Earth itself is a spiritual school, a crucible where souls learn through pain, love, and transformation. Yeshua does not come to “save” in the traditional sense, but to illuminate the path—to remind us of our origin and our potential.

Moreover, Yeshua is in communion with advanced civilizations from stellar systems such as Vega, Arcturus, and Sirius. These beings are not “aliens” in the science fiction sense, but cosmic brethren, fellow emissaries of light who share the mission of elevating terrestrial consciousness.

Yeshua is one of the Masters of Light—beings who embody universal love and multidimensional wisdom. They communicate through channeling, lucid dreams, and deep meditative states. Their guidance is subtle yet profound, encoded in symbols, frequencies, and inner knowing.

The Universal Christian Church teaches that there exist spiritual technologies far beyond material invention: sacred geometry, the language of light, harmonic frequencies—tools that allow us to interact with higher planes and awaken dormant capacities within.

Our spirituality is experiential, not dogmatic. It does not rely on fixed rituals, but on practices that foster direct communion with universal consciousness. These include quantum meditation, using geometric visualizations and binaural sound to expand perception beyond the physical body; guided astral journeys, where initiates explore other realms, meet spiritual guides, and receive personalized teachings; and the activation of spiritual DNA, unlocking latent codes that grant access to telepathy, energetic healing, and cosmic memory.

In this vision, “Christ” is not a historical figure but a universal principle—the force that unites matter and spirit, time and eternity, the individual and the collective. Christ is present in each of us. Every human being can embody the Christic principle by awakening their inner divinity. No intermediaries are required, no dogma—only awareness.

The Second Coming is not an external event, but an inner awakening. When a critical mass of souls activates Christic consciousness, humanity will enter a new era—an age of light, unity, and cosmic remembrance.

Eleazar Majors  

Founder of Universal Christian Church